|
Tao Te King von Lao Tse |
Jim Clatfelter, 2000 http://www.geocities.com/~jimclatfelter/jimztao.html Home | Index |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 |
| 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 |
| 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 |
| 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 |
| 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 |
| 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 |
Introduction to the Headless Tao
I discovered the Tao Te Ching in the mid-60s. It was the first book of its kind to come my way. Everything about it was right. It valued the simple and the spontaneous. It valued wholeness over opposition and contention. And it valued the mystery within and everywhere. In the mid-70s I discovered another book, On Having No Head by Douglas Harding. This book showed me that where others see my head, I see nothing, the nothing that is the source and destiny of all things. In other words, it showed me the Tao. In 1999 I learned that the Chinese ideograph for Tao is composed of two graphs, one that means go and one that means head. Of course! The Tao is the gone head, gone because it never was here. I can see the Tao right here and now! It’s the bare awareness or presence that I truly am. This called for some exposition, hence my interpretation of Lao Tzu’s classic. The original is terse, and it’s largely in verse. So I set out to make my version similar. It’s the same length as the original, and it’s in rhyme. And it shows the Tao, shows how to see it. Lao Tzu asks that we see the Tao. All else follows from that. Lao Tzu also says that most will reject the Tao, even laugh at it. Are you daring enough to look instead of laugh?